EconReporter Plus

Feb 21, 2026

Global Tariff is now 15%; Hassett 'retracts' sth

February 21, 2026

Trump raises the global tariff to 15% from 10% announced yesterday (Truth Social)

Joey PolitanošŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ's avatar
Joey PolitanošŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ
2mo

ah, I almost forgot how bad it is to work on an entire article only to have Donald Trump completely change the tariff rates just as I finish

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
+
Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday, after MANY months of contemplation, by the United States Supreme Court, please let this statement serve to represent that I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been "ripping" the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level. During the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally permissible Tariffs, which will continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great Again - GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD
J. TRUMP
8 ReTruths 22 Likes
2/21/26, 10:59 AM
Martin Baccardax's avatar
Martin Baccardax
2mo

Friday: you now have absolute certainty on tariffs Saturday: I am raising the tariff to 15%

Carl Quintanilla's avatar
Carl Quintanilla
2mo

Post image
Simon Lester's avatar
Simon Lester
2mo

At least now there will be a Section 301 comment process that lawyers and lobbyists can use to make submissions and bill their clients!

Simon Lester's avatar
Simon Lester
2mo

The economic concerns that motivated Congress to enact Section 122 are not present today.

Post image

There is a tariff-free window?

Ivan the K ā„¢'s avatar
Ivan the K ā„¢
2mo

Following up on this, it appears the window is open. www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-... cc:@eamonjavers.bsky.social

Post image

Something about Section 122 from yesterday

Simon Lester's avatar
Simon Lester
2mo

I wrote something about the new Section 122 "temporary import surcharge" -- let's just call it a tariff though, right? -- but it won't answer many of your questions, so don't get your hopes up too high!

Section 122 as a (Partial) Replacement for the IEEPA Tariffs

Apparently, this is the era of dusting off old international economic policy statutes and figuring out what they mean and how they work. After the Supreme Court's ruling today in Learning Resources, h...


https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2026/02/section-122-as-a-partial-replacement-for-the-ieepa-tariffs/
EconReporter's avatar
EconReporter
2mo

Is that really a problem? These are... treasuries we are talking about?

Post image
Menzie Chinn's avatar
Menzie Chinn
2mo

Section 122 invocation vs. reality (reserves, the $)... #EconSky econbrowser.com/archives/202...

Post image
Steve Craven's avatar
Steve Craven
2mo

Maybe. Most 301 cases seem to take a year or more. 232 might be a little quicker but requires establishing that foreign practices are a national security threat. There are significant hurdles to get over for both which, of course, is why Trump went with his IEPPA shortcut.

Bancroft Sutherland's avatar
Bancroft Sutherland
2mo

For them to frame this chart as a bad thing is wild. And worth noting that all the deals that are supposedly being cut to have foreigners make huge investments in US manufacturing etc. would exacerbate the very "problem" they are describing.

US Liabilities by Category, in which Portfolio Investment, Direct Investment, and Other Investment are all trending higher.


Kevin Hassett "retracts" his comment on disciplining NY Fed researchers (Larry Kotlikoff Substacks)

Nick Timiraos's avatar
Nick Timiraos
2mo

Hassett retracts his admonition of the Fed economists: ā€œThe Fed’s independence extends to its research. It and it alone must decide what research to conduct to further its mission. The authors of this study are all excellent economists.ā€ larrykotlikoff.substack.com/p/kevin-hass...

Paul Krugman's avatar
Paul Krugman
2mo

This wasn't an apology, or a real retraction. It was basically "I'm sorry you feel that way."

Justin Wolfers's avatar
Justin Wolfers
2mo

Good news: Happy Kevin walks back his call for NY Fed economists to be disciplined. Bad news: It's bullshit. He says the Fed should stay out of issues like... whether tariffs cause inflation. But inflation is central to monetary policy! He's still saying: The regime shall not be contradicted.

Feb 23, 2026

EconReporter Plus