Another day of software stock selloff...?
Astonishing that this post by Citrini Research was responsible for billions in market cap getting vaporized today. What did you think of this "thought exercise"? Would love to see @citrini.bsky.social active here on Bluesky www.citriniresearch.com/p/2028gic
As always w/ @citrini.bsky.social an interesting read but I’m not sure it’s internally consistent. Main questions that came to mind: 1/ Agent owners: what are they doing with the money they’re making? Why isn’t THAT fueling employment, GDP ? stock prices? www.citriniresearch.com/p/2028gic
I’m pretty skeptical, in part because they completely misunderstand how platform cos build their two-sided network effect. The code isn’t novel, it’s the massive investment in restaurant/driver/customer familiarity that is hard to replicate. They’re massively misstating where so many moats come from
Some proof this is the Citrini Research selloff: The viral dystopian post is hitting everywhere! -James van Geelen is top 3 in Bloomberg profile views over the past hour -4.5M impressions, 2.1K RTs, 12K bookmarks on OG post (per X) sherwood.news/markets/soft...
$IBM -10% on a rope down ... why? Because of Anthropic of course
So, DOGE would have been able to do a lot more damage had this dropped a year ago.
So dumb, given that Anthropic shared this capability..... three months ago www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwMu...
Waller shows some reservations on March cut
The speech
Speech by Governor Waller on the economic outlook: www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/s... Watch live: www.youtube.com/live/ARrKDX-... Learn more about Governor Waller: www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/...
The Notable Commentaries
Fed governor Chris Waller conditions his support for a March cut (or hold) on the February payroll data due for release on March 6. “As things stand today, I rate these two possible outcomes as close to a coin flip.” www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/s...
#Fed Gov Waller: « If employment data support the idea of an improvement in the labor market that continued in Feb, along with additional progress toward 2% inflation, that could result in my outlook turning a bit more positive and my view of appropriate monetary policy may tilt toward a pause… »
Waller equally weights labor markets slowing further and reacceleration (leading to inflation). That’s a hawkish shift relative to his prior stance that heavily over-weighted the labor market risks. But not a dramatic one.
Waller, a Fed governor who dissented against January's rate cut pause, said he is open to holding rates steady in March if the labor market continues to stabilize. He also doesn't expect the Supreme Court ruling to impact his rate outlook www.nytimes.com/2026/02/23/b... @nytimes.com
Exporters & importers eating price hikes, planned markups. BUT CPI data still not showing again. Not clear how IEEPA tariffs decision will affect inflation. Notes Feb emp & PCE inflation for Jan before March meeting. Coin flip on his views for March. #NABE2026 Notes AI: CEOs focus on cuts.
Fed Governor Waller on court tariff decision impact: “This ruling is unlikely to have a significant impact on my view of the appropriate stance of policy.”
Gov. Waller this a.m.: "Jobs last year [were] 181,000 and that’s going to get revised down, trust me. 2.9 million people entered the labor force despite the immigration [drop], OK?" Connection to my recent vid: Off-the-sidelines flow pumping workers in (2mil in Jan.) in the face of stagnant demand.
More on tarifffffffffff.....
Some more stories about Tariff
Trying to sort out all the ramifications of the IEEPA ruling for US tariffs? Check out this piece by law prof Kathleen Claussen: "What Just Happened: Tariffs Are Gone and Then Back Again"
Following SCOTUS’s IEEPA tariff ruling, USTR Greer pledged new Section 301 probes into "unjustifiable, unreasonable, discriminatory, and burdensome acts, policies, and practices." For South Korea, the flag: “discrimination against U.S. technology companies and digital goods and services."
Nice article from @sdonnan.bsky.social walking through the question of whether the conditions for use of tariffs under section 122 are met.
Shawn Donnan
@sdonnan.bsky.social
We should be talking more about the fact the president of the world’s largest economy just declared it’s facing a payments crisis. Once, that would have caused turmoil in financial markets. Now it’s just another reason for tariffs. My latest for @bloomberg.com: www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Trump Pegs New Tariffs to a Payments Crisis That Experts Doubt Exists
With his move to impose new global tariffs, US President Donald Trump isn’t just trying to repair a trade policy dismantled by a Supreme Court rebuke. He’s also declaring the world’s largest economy i...
www.bloomberg.com
My thoughts on the use of section 122 of the 1974 trade act to impose a global 15% tariff on US imports. No balance of payments crisis, no authority via @CNNConnect the World. #Econ #EconSky video.snapstream.net/Play/8yfLG8u...